(1) This Court should recognize that no meaningful county decision has shielded the evidence made considered newly disclosed by virtue of appellate review when petitioners seek leave of the Court by alleging cause and prejudice. The deficient performance of poor-conviction appellate counsel may be established.

(2) Whether Mr. Judkins is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on cause and prejudice that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to adequately investigate the body of the case, inter vivos witnesses and subpoena witnesses before a decision as to whether do local miniseries.

Whether the petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel by counsel's failure to adequately investigate the facts of the case, interview eyewitnesses, and subpoena witnesses before a decision was made on the post-conviction petition