No. 18-822
Steven G. Cohen v. Grievance Administrator, Attorney Grievance Commission of Michigan
Response Waived
Tags: attorney-discipline civil-rights due-process first-amendment free-speech free-speech-petition judicial-corruption judicial-misconduct petition petition-clause professional-ethics professional-misconduct rosa-parks-estate
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw FirstAmendment DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw FirstAmendment DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-02-22
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER THE ARBITRARY, CONTRADICTORY AND FACT-FREE PROCEEDINGS CONDUCTED BY THE MICHIGAN ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE BOARD VIOLATED PETITIONER'S RIGHTS UNDER THE FREE SPEECH AND PETITION CLAUSES OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AND THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF THE FIFTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the arbitrary, contradictory and fact-free proceedings conducted by the Michigan Attorney Discipline Board violated Petitioner's rights under the Free Speech and Petition Clauses of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and the Due Process Clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments
Docket Entries
2019-02-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.
2019-02-04
Waiver of right of respondent Grievance Administrator, Attorney Grievance Commission of Michigan to respond filed.
2018-12-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 28, 2019)
Attorneys
Grievance Administrator, Attorney Grievance Commission of Michigan
Robert E. Edick — Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission, Respondent
Steven G. Cohen
Steven G. Cohen — Cohen & Associates PC, Petitioner