Nathaniel Hoskins v. United States
DueProcess
Whether the prosecution's pretrial evidentiary suppression of various law enforcement reports, interviews and statements favorable to the Petitioner violated due process, under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), where the evidence is material either to guilt or to punishment, irrespective of the good or bad faith of the prosecution and thereby undermined confidence in the outcome of Petitioner's trial.
Whether the prosecution's pretrial evidentiary suppression of various law enforcement reports, interviews and statements favorable to the Petitioner violated due process, under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), where the evidence is material either to guilt or to punishment, irrespective of the good or bad faith of the prosecution and thereby undermined confidence in the outcome of Petitioner's trial