Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals violated clearly established federal laws by denying the petitioner forma pauperis in U.S. Court of Appeals case no: 18-10949-J under the imminent danger Standard conditions shown by the petitioner, and not grant the petitioner forma pauperis under the same imminent danger Standard?

Does the U.S. Court of Appeals have to uphold its own rulings in Brown V. Johnson, 38, 3d. 34, 1350, 1 Cir. 1200 and apply the imminent danger standard to all cases that warrant it, like the petitioner's case?

How Could the US. Court of Appeals grant a leave to proceed in forma pauperis in US. Court of Appeals Case no.18-10949 under the 'imminent danger' standards shown by the petitioner, and not grant the petitioner Verma in forma pauperis under the same imminent danger standards condition shown by the petitioner in US. Court of Appeals no.18-13010-C