No. 18-8203

Darryl Burghardt v. Renee Stein-Graham

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-02-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: access-to-courts civil-action civil-procedure civil-rights due-process first-amendment fourteenth-amendment in-forma-pauperis pro-se service-of-process standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference: 2019-04-26
Question Presented (from Petition)

Is anincarcerated prose Petitioner's First & Fourteenth Amendment U.S. Constitutional rights violated if they're under In Forma Pauperis (IFP) status and they have their civil action dismissed due to the u.s. Marshals not being able to serve a [particular] defendant a copy of the complaint & summons thereto after the petitioner already or help locate the defendant?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a petitioner's First and Fourteenth Amendment constitutional rights are violated if their civil action is dismissed due to the U.S. Marshal's inability to serve a defendant a copy of the complaint, despite the petitioner providing the court with sufficient information to locate the defendant

Docket Entries

2019-04-29
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2019.
2018-11-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 1, 2019)

Attorneys

Darryl Burghardt
Darryl Burghardt — Petitioner