No. 18-8167
Frederick H. Banks v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeals civil-procedure civil-rights competency due-process error-correction indian-law standing tribal-sovereignty
Latest Conference:
2019-03-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the Appals Court err in faulng to find tat "Sound Reasons Exist" for filimg tre Error Coran Nobis pedton?
Did the Appeas Courter in failing to apply te Indani caron of Construction of Montana v. Blackfeet Tribe, 471 U.s. 759cl985)?
Dd te Appears lousit err i faulng to find that Dre proce was volated by te Dutrat Cont fa to Appont a Guerdn ad Liten for Banks- a declared Incompetent?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Appeals Court err in failing to find that sound reasons existed for filing the error correction motion?
Docket Entries
2019-04-01
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/29/2019.
2019-03-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-10-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 29, 2019)
Attorneys
Frederick H. Banks
Frederick Banks — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent