No. 18-8151

Loren Williamson, III v. Charles L. Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-02-27
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 28-usc-2254a 28-usc-2254d conflict-of-interest due-process due-process-equal-protection-disparity equal-protection parties-to-the-proceeding post-conviction post-conviction-process right-to-counsel sixth-amendment sixth-amendment-right-to-counsel
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-04-26
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether a Certificate of Appealability should issule below to allowthe Ninth Circuit to determine whether. Lowrence v.Florida, 549 0.5.3.27, 33y(2007,as applied. to Williamson's crcumstances, creates a Due Process. and Equal Protection disparity which Congress neither anticipated nor intended between trial and pleading defendants in Arizona's post-conviction process where both are obligated to use that procedure in the first instance for claims implicating the Sisth Amendment Right to Counsel's Effective Assistancer. resulting in an impermissible conslict between 28use $$2a44((1)and)(2)

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a Certificate of Appealability should issue

Docket Entries

2019-04-29
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2019.
2019-03-15
Waiver of right of respondents Ryan, Warden, et al. to respond filed.
2019-02-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 29, 2019)

Attorneys

Loren Williamson
Loren Williamson II — Petitioner
Ryan, Warden, et al.
Michael Fernando ValenzuelaArizona Attorney General's Office, Respondent