Does the State have a Constitutional duty to bear the burden of proving that an error in enforcement in order to obtain a conviction, and/or a fair vote of comity and fair and rigorous effect upon the jury verdict in violation of the OSCA. 1st, 4th, 6th, and 14th?

Should the lower Court's squarely apply a different standard in reviewing fundamentally flawed proceedings; And did the deferring to the Ninth Circuit in en banc finding in Habeas Corpus, lower Courts that petitioner procedurally defaulted, in lieu of affirming les OSCA. 1st, 4th, 6th, and 14th?

Whether the lower court's order denying the petitioner's request for a fair review of court and jury proceedings violated the petitioner's constitutionally secured rights to due-process, equal-protection, free-speech, 6th-amendment, fair-trial, and fundamental-fairness in the criminal proceedings, and whether the court erred in denying the petitioner's request to rediscover evidence to support their claims in lieu of applying the standard for appellate review of the conviction and sentence.