No. 18-8146
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 4th-amendment civil-rights due-process fourth-amendment interstate-police-action jurisdiction jurisdictional-violation minor-consent out-of-state-jurisdiction police-conduct wire-communication wiretap-act
Latest Conference:
2019-04-12
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER THE MINORS CONSENT FOR THE INTERCEPTION
OF WIRE COMMUNICATION IS LEGALLY AND
CONSTITUTIONALLY VALID, WHEN SECURED BY POLICE ACTING
OUTSIDE OF THEIR HOME STATE JURISDICTION, VIOLATING THE
VISITED STATE'S WIRETAP ACT PROHIBITING A MINOR FROM
CONSENTING?
WHETHER POLICE CONDUCT OUTSIDE OF THEIR HOME
STATE JURISDICTION IS REASONABLE UNDER THE 4TH
AMENDMENT WHEN OFFICERS COMMIT FELONY CRIMINAL ACTS
UNDER THE VISITED STATE'S WIRETAP ACT PRIOR TO THE
INTERCEPTS?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the minors consent for the interception of wire communication is legally and constitutionally valid, when secured by police acting outside of their home state jurisdiction, violating the visited state's wiretap act prohibiting a minor from consenting?
Docket Entries
2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-03-21
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2019-01-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 29, 2019)
Attorneys
Florida
Jamie Geer
Jamie D. Geer — Petitioner