No. 18-8133
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-plea-bargaining drug-trafficking due-process firearm-offense firearms plea-bargaining plea-colloquy sentencing statutory-construction
Latest Conference:
2019-03-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
When Congress enacted and amended 18 U.S.C. Section 924(C)(1)(A) periodically, did Congress give federal criminal courts discretion to make their own findings of guilty when accepting a Rule (11) Plea Colloquy factual basis without following Congressional statutory construction that governs 18 U.S.C. Section 924(C)(1)(A)?
I.
II.
III.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When Congress enacted and amended 18 U.S.C. Section 924(G)(1)
Docket Entries
2019-08-23
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-08-01
DISTRIBUTED.
2019-04-25
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-04-01
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/29/2019.
2019-03-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-02-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 28, 2019)
Attorneys
Daryl Mingo
Daryl Mingo — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent