No. 18-8122

Ralph Hall v. Darwin LaClair, et al.

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2019-02-25
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights due-process federal-jurisdiction habeas-corpus jury-selection newly-discovered-evidence public-trial sixth-amendment standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess Securities
Latest Conference: 2019-04-26
Question Presented (from Petition)

WHETHER the District Court's reliance upon Circuit holdings in Estelle v. McGune and William Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, constitutes operative pleadings under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Court's holdings for Bernal Construed Lopez v. Smith (135 S.Ct. 1(2014)), particularly where District and Circuit Courts by logical principle directly identifies the governing law of a particular case specifically but unreasonably applies it to the facts of the STATE concerning a particular case specifically, and failure to observe procedural rule M & Quins v. Perkins (133 S.Ct. at 1931-32 (2013)) MATHIS v. GOOD (937 F.2d 790, 794 (2d Cir. 1991)).

WHETHER STATE COURT PROCESSING OF CPLR 5525(C) MOTION, PREJUDICED AND MOTION AS A FAILURE OF STATE COURT PEOPLE ARS, 85 N.Y.2d 794, 40 N.4, 28 381 (1976) RAMAHAN CONWAY, 601 F.3d 66 (2d Cir. 1996).

Question not identified.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Sixth Amendment right to a public trial extends to the voir dire process of jury selection

Docket Entries

2019-04-29
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2019.
2018-09-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 27, 2019)

Attorneys

Ralph Hall
Ralph Hall — Petitioner