first trivl? If the orginal tri
rial aftorded all of the required
procedurnl protection and if the ins titntional players- the
prosentor the defense attorney, thejudge, the jury- livedup
to their Legal moral and ethical obligations. Should the criminial
jutice system wahis hAnd at my ilemm and s " Bad Bad
Wck its not our bault?

Hasjustice beerawhen it uries a pro se Appellant. who has
seend
She is dlaiming her actual innolence?

Shond Appellant have to remmin in prisn became of the bailre
this cAse, present mibigating evidence and witnesses phat would
have caused reasonable conbt?

iv) Isnt it woeth the time and eftort to send Appellant back
received a fair and impartial frial because these errors are
So obvions, prejudical and substamtial that bailure tocorrect
them wonld infrige on Appilunk due proces riyht and damage
the intergrity of the judical process?

Whether the procedural protections required to challenge a conviction under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 were violated, including the right to an impartial trial and the opportunity to present mitigating evidence