Malcolm Roland Allen v. United States
HabeasCorpus
WHETHER at the time of evidentiary hearing was granted to challenge the ineffective counsel's failure to file a Notice of Appeal per Petitioner's request and to object or investigate in disqualified career offender sentencing guideline which one of two prior convictions imposed less than 1 year term of imprisonment, should the U.S District Court appoint him another counsel to represent him to challenge his ineffective counsel's failure?
WHETHER is it ineffective counsel or not based his deficient performance failed to object and investigate disqualified career, offender sentencing guideline and failed to file a Notice of Appeal per petitioner's request where both failures substantially prejudiced him resulted in an increase of sentence term pursuant to §4B1.1, ;4B1.2 and §3742?
WHETHER is it contradicting to 18 U.S.C.3006A and a governing Rule in Section 2255 or not? when the 4th Circuit Court and the U.S District Court denied petitioner's right to be represented at all stages of judicial proceedings and conflicting even its own precedents as well as this Court's decisions?
Whether ineffective counsel failed to file a notice of appeal and object to career offender sentencing guideline