No. 18-8051
Yeison Valencia Torres v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-split conflict-of-laws criminal-procedure drug-enforcement drug-offense due-process equal-protection maritime-drug-law maritime-law safety-valve sentencing sentencing-relief statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess FifthAmendment Immigration JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess FifthAmendment Immigration JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-03-22
Question Presented (from Petition)
The exclusion of the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (46 U.S.C. § 70503) from eligibility for safety valve violates equal protection, because there is no rational basis to make safety valve relief unavailable to offenders who commit wholly foreign drug offenses, while making it available to those who commit the same offense within the territorial United States. Furthermore, the Supreme Court should also grant certiorari because there exists a conflict between the D.C. Circuit and and the Ninth and Eleventh Circuit Court of appeals.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the exclusion of the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (46 U.S.C. § 70503) from eligibility for safety valve violates equal protection
Docket Entries
2019-03-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.
2019-02-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-02-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 25, 2019)
Attorneys
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Yeison Valencia Torres
Israel Jose Encinosa — Petitioner