No. 18-805
Eric S. Strohmeyer v. Surface Transportation Board, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure clear-error due-process jurisdiction motion-to-dismiss standing standing-doctrine surface-transportation-board third-circuit transportation
Latest Conference:
2019-03-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
Was it clear error for the Third Circuit to fail to address the issue of whether the Surface Transportation Board ("STB") had the jurisdiction to render a decision in the underlying proceeding? (Even if the court determines that Petitioner does not have standing.)
Were the allegations in Petitioner's Affidavit sufficient to defeat Respondents' Motion to Dismiss for lack of standing?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the Third Circuit's failure to address the Surface Transportation Board's jurisdiction a clear error?
Docket Entries
2019-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2019-02-12
Waiver of right of respondent Surface Transportation Board, et al. to respond filed.
2019-01-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 21, 2019.
2019-01-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 22, 2019 to February 21, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-10-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 22, 2019)
Attorneys
Eric S. Strohmeyer
Eric Strohmeyer — Petitioner
Surface Transportation Board, et al.
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent