No. 18-8039

James Barstad v. Washington

Lower Court: Washington
Docketed: 2019-02-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process habeas-corpus invasion jurisdiction legal-standing suspension venue void-ab-initio war
Latest Conference: 2019-04-18
Question Presented (from Petition)

Has the Great Writ of Habeas Corpus been suspended in Americas If so, what entity has declared war against and invaded America?

Could STATE OF WASHINGTON CORPORATION end/or UNITED STATES CORPORATION obtain Personal and/or Sublect Matter Jurisdiction, and 'enuat over 3ames_9en$temin; Sarstad. a Private Natural Men without a Contract granting them said Jurisdiction and/or Oenuel

If STATE OF WASHINGTON CORPORATION and/or UNITED STATES CORPORATION actds without 9urisdiction. is such action Void Ab Initio

If, once challenged, 5urisdiction, venue, and the cause and nature of the charge(s) are not provem, does this them constitute a compulsory counterclaim, purstent to PRCP 13(a), reqUiring remedy in law, due to and owing to the Petitioner, Secured Party/Creditor, who has become HolderIn-Dure-CoursJ

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Has the Great Writ of Habeas Corpus been suspended in America? If so, what entity has declared war against and invaded America?

Docket Entries

2019-04-22
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/18/2019.
2018-08-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 22, 2019)

Attorneys

James Barstad
James Barstad — Petitioner