No. 18-8032

Edgar Arellano v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2019-02-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment 6th-amendment appellate-procedure constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fourteenth-amendment ineffective-assistance pre-trial-investigation right-to-counsel sixth-amendment
Latest Conference: 2019-04-18
Question Presented (from Petition)

PETITIONER'S COUNSEL WAS INEFFECTIVE IN FAILING TO CONDUCT A REASONABLE PRE-TRIAL INVESTIGATION. THIS VIOLATED PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO COUNSEL, AS GUARANTEED BY AMENDMENTS 6 AND 14 TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION

PETITIONER WAS CONVICTED ON THE BASIS OF A GUILTY PLEA THAT WAS THE PRODUCT OF INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL. THIS VIOLATED PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO COUNSEL AND TO DUE PROCESS OF LAW AS GUARANTEED BY AMENDMENTS 6, 5 AND 14 TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION.

PETITIONER'S APPELLATE COUNSEL WAS INEFFECTIVE IN FAILING TO AUGMENT THE APPELLATE RECORD WITH THE REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPTS OF THE PRELIMINARY HEARING TO COURT CASE (#VA070097) TO SHOW THAT PETITIONER'S PRIOR WAS INVALID. THIS VIOLATED PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO COUNSEL, AS GUARANTEED BY AMENDMENTS 6 AND 14 TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Ineffective assistance of counsel

Docket Entries

2019-04-22
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/18/2019.
2018-05-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 22, 2019)

Attorneys

Edgar Arellano
Edgar Arellano — Petitioner