Question Presented (from Petition)
Could reasonable jurists debate whether a court may permit an amendment to an initial habeas corpus petition, without applying 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)'s limitations on "second or successive" petitions, when appellate proceedings after a denial of that initial petition are ongoing?
Could reasonable jurists debate whether Petitioner has made a substantial showing of a violation of his right to an impartial jury with evidence that at least one juror relied on anti-gay stereotypes and animus in sentencing him to death?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Could reasonable jurists debate whether a court may permit an amendment to an initial habeas corpus petition, without applying 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)'s limitations on 'second or successive' petitions, when appellate proceedings after a denial of that initial petition are ongoing?
2019-04-15
Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Law Professors GRANTED.
2019-04-15
Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. GRANTED.
2019-04-15
Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by American Civil Liberties Union, et al. GRANTED.
2019-03-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-03-25
Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.
2019-03-25
Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by American Civil Liberties Union, et al.
2019-03-25
Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Law Professors.
2019-03-22
Reply of petitioner Charles Rhines filed.
2019-03-13
Brief of respondent Darin Young in opposition filed.
2019-02-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 25, 2019)
2018-12-11
Application (18A612) granted by Justice Gorsuch extending the time to file until February 15, 2019.
2018-12-03
Application (18A612) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 17, 2018 to February 15, 2019, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.