No. 18-80
Pamela Melvin v. Peter O'Rourke, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Response Waived
Tags: abuse-of-discretion due-process equal-protection inherent-power judicial-review search-and-seizure standard-of-review statutory-interpretation veterans-affairs veterans-law waived-arguments
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether 38 USC §7292 prohibits review of the Veterans Court's decision and evidence.
Whether the Federal Circuit's decision conflicts with this Court's decisions, its own precedents, the decisions of other U.S Court of Appeals and the U.S. Constitution regarding courts' inherent power to sanction, standard of review abuse of discretion, waived arguments, search and seizures, due process, failure to deny is an admission, and equal protection.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 38 USC §7292 prohibits review of the Veterans Court's decision and evidence
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-03
Waiver of right of respondent Peter O'Rourke, Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs to respond filed.
2018-04-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 16, 2018)
2018-02-08
Application (17A833) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until April 12, 2018.
2018-01-31
Application (17A833) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 11, 2018 to April 12, 2018, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Pamela Melvin
Pamela Melvin — Petitioner
Peter O'Rourke, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent