WHEN THE PETITIONER GERALD ADGER #05-B-1254 WAIVED HIS RIGHT FOR A JURY TRIAL, WAS THE JUDGE SUPPOSE TO DENY GERALD ADGER WAIVER OF THE JURY TRIAL BECAUSE AN HUNTLEY HEARING WAS HELD AND FOUND THAT THE PETITIONER GERALD ADGER #05-B-2754 PRE-TRIAL STATEMENTS WERE VOLUNTARY AND AN TRIAL ON THE MERITS BY A JUDGE ALONE WOULD DEPRIVE THE PETITIONER GERARD ADGER #05-B-2254 OF AN SECOND DETERMINATION, BY A JURY, OF THE VOLUNTARINESS OF INCULPATORY STATEMENTS MADE BY THE PETITIONER GERAD ADGER #05-B-2254 (PEOPLE v. DICOSTANZO, 31AD24 250,252 CUM DEPT 1969), AFFD 26MY2d JOLY 1965)?

Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation and application of the relevant statutory and constitutional provisions