No. 18-7975

William Krisstofer Wolf v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-02-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability constitutional-rights due-process evidentiary-hearing fifth-amendment ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel perjury perjury-subornation prosecutorial-misconduct sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-03-22
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether the Ninth Circuit's decision now conflicts with this courts long standing rulings on the known and willing. use of PERJURY of material fact, the known and willing subornation of PERJURY, thereby depriving a person of their Fifth and. Sixth Amendment protected. Constitutional Rights.

Whether the Ninth Circuit's decision now conflicts with this courts long standing rulings on ineffective assistance of counsel, when counsel fails to: Secure exculpatory evidence, known. to the prosecution, but withheld or destoryed; introduce favorable evidence showing no predisposition; introduce evidence supporting defendants entrapment defense; subject the prosecution's case and witnesses to meani-ngful adversarial questioning; fails to object to perjury or elicit the truth; fails to motion for a mistrial when PERJURY was admitted at sentensing or on direct appeal; and adequatly fails to prepare for trial. . .

Whether the Ninth Circuit's decision now conflicts with this and other circuit court rulings on the issuance of a Certificate of Appealablility, or the necessity of an evidentuary hearing upon the presentation of a colorable claim of PERJURY; perform its sworn... duty to prevent perjury and prosecutorial misconduct.

Is the term 'substantial showing' Constitutionally vague when PERJURY is admitted.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Ninth Circuit's decision now conflicts with this court's long standing rulings on the known and willing use of perjury of material fact, the known and willing subornation of perjury, thereby depriving a person of their Fifth and Sixth Amendment protected Constitutional Rights

Docket Entries

2019-03-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.
2019-02-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-02-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 18, 2019)

Attorneys

United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
William Krisstofer Wolf
William Krisstofer Wolf — Petitioner