Was Petitioner's plea of guilty knowingly and voluntarily entered where counsel's failure to inform petitioner that all offenses charged in the indictment were time-barred by statute of limitationsi; and waiver of time-bar defense through guilty plea without objection was not-knowingly and voLuntarily entered, make a "substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right" requiring a Certificate of Appealability (COA) - to issue pursuant to the requirements of Miller-El v. Cockrell, 123 S.Ct. 1029 (2003) and Slackv. McDaniel, 120 S.Ct. 1595 (2000) 7

Was counsel ineffective under the tw I b prong test established in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) for failing to inform petitioner that all charges he was pleading guilty to were time-barred by the statute of limitations; and advising petitioner to waive a time bar statute-of limitations defense without snaking objections to the time barr waiver-?

Was Petitioner's plea of guilty knowingly and voluntarily entered?