No. 18-7957

Ikemefula Charles Ibeabuchi v. Mikel Steinfeld

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-02-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion civil-procedure civil-procedure-abuse-of-discretion compulsory-process constitutional-question due-process jurisdiction sixth-amendment-compulsory-process standing
Latest Conference: 2019-04-12
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether or the Jue Telb di f Lave to amend Complaint is a reversible exor?

Whether or not, Judge Teilborg abused his disCretion in Concluding or, not Coneluding that, Appelles act was under color of state law, which is a fundamental ervrortest?

Whether or not, Judge Teilborg, exceeded his Junsdiction in defermining that, Appllant did not state a Claim, under the Constitutional of Compulsory Process of Sixth Amendt ment?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the judge's denial of leave to amend complaint is a reversible error

Docket Entries

2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2018-11-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 15, 2019)

Attorneys

Ikemefula Charles Ibeabuchi
Ikemefula Charles Ibeabuchi — Petitioner
Mikel Steinfeld
Mikel Patrick SteinfeldMaricopa County Office of the Public Defender, Respondent