CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT "NON-VIOLENT" OFFENDERS, SO STIPULATE EARINGS, AN PAROLE CONSIDERATION FOR WHO RECIEVE A DETERMINATE SENTENCE, DO NOT NEED A INDIVIDUALS END OF THEIR SENTENCE, HOWEVER SOME OF THESE INDIVIDUALS URRENTLY ARE ELIGIBLE FOR PAROLE CONSIDERATION HEARINGS BEFORE THEY HAVE SERVED THEIR ENTIRE SENTENCE ."PAROLE CONSIDERATIONS OR "NON-VIOLENT OFFENDERS, S STIPULATES,"THE MEASURE CHANGES THE "PRIMARY OFFENSE" AS A RESULT, ERVING THE FULL PRISON TERM FOR THEIR ENTENCING ENHANCEMENTS OR PRIORS. PETITIONER WAS SENTENCED TO A PRIMARY SENTENCE, 2·28.2O4 FOR POSESSION OF FIREARM, PETITIONERS PRIMARY ENTENCE ENDED 8.3I.QO16 .DUE TO PETITUNERS PRIMARY SENTENCE ELABSED HIS SUPREME COURT IN"COMMOM LAW"IMMEDIATE REUEF, FOR TO BE RELEASED, EW ADDITIONAL TIME RELATED TO OTHER CRIMES ARE NON-VIOLENT, WIICH IS TO PRIMARY SENTENCE FOR SAN JOSE, (A 95113 CASE C1477911 8.31.16. UNDER PROF 57 STIPULATES CASES THAT ARE TACKED ON "AFTER FULL TERM OF PRIMARY SENTENCE, ALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIUS ARE TO; VACATE ALL PRIORS , ENHANCEMENTS, CONSECUTIVE SENTENCES (AD-HARGE),AN ALTERNATE SENTENCES . CDC SCOTT KERNAN HAS ABUSED HIS AUTHORITY, AN SUBJECTED PEFHUAN PETITIONER TO DISCRIMINATION UNDER COLOR OFAUTHORITY, WHEN SCOTT KERNAN MADE PETITIONER "ELIGIBLE FOR PROPOSITIONS7 ETITIONER EARLY RELEASE PAROLE TO GO HOME AT "BPH" CLEARLY SHOWS DISCRIMINATIUN WIHEN PROP 57 33.30% CREDITS PETITIONER IS ELIBIBLE FOR 1S UNDER AN IN "UMBRELLA PROP 57 WHOLE MEASURE FOR NON-VILENT OFFENDERS ( SAME (SEE ATTACHE DESCRIPTION OFFENDER TUPE SHEET ALLOWING ALL Q9O REGISTRAINTS TO BE ELIGIPLE FoR WHOLE PROPESITION 57 MEASURE

Whether individuals who receive a determinate sentence do not need a parole consideration hearing to be released from prison at the end of their sentence