No. 18-7945
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: appeal appeals appellate-review civil-rights constitutional-question criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process equal-protection judicial-bias legal-standard michigan-court-of-appeals procedural-conflict standing
Latest Conference:
2019-06-20
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER THE MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
DECISION TO REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR
A NEW TRIAL IN TWO SIMILARLY SITUATED
CASES AS PETITIONERS CASE, CONFLICT WITH
THE DECISION WHICH DENIED PETITIONER, AS
A CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION THIS COURT
SHOULD ADDRESS?
2. WHETHER THE MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT'S
DECISION THAT DENIED PETITIONERS
APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FOR
FAILING TO MEET THE BURDEN ESTABLISHED
ENTITLEMENT NO RELIEF UNDER MCR. 5060)
"6000 CAUSE, IS ERRONEOUS WITH A CLAIM
OF JUDICIAL BIAS?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Michigan Court of Appeals decision to reversed and remanded for a new trial in two similarly situated cases as petitioner's case, conflict with the decision which denied petitioner's constitutional question this Court should address
Docket Entries
2019-06-24
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-06-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2019.
2019-04-25
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-02-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 15, 2019)
Attorneys
Carl Allen Watts
Carl Allen Watts — Petitioner