No. 18-7941
Trevor Little v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process ex-post-facto ex-post-facto-clause restitution sentencing statute-of-limitations statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2019-03-22
Question Presented (from Petition)
the lower Courts, Fourth Circuit. Violated The Petitioner's
st Facto Clause of The Cluted States Constituton, Artice,
on 9 Clause 3, When It Still Enforce The Fine Pursuant
USCs 3e3(6) April 24.196 Version Instead of The 19S Version
The Time of Offense Conduct?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the lower courts' Fourth Circuit violate the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution Article I, Section 9, Clause 3, when it still enforced the 1994 version of 18 U.S.C. 3613(b) instead of the 1998 version during the time of the petitioner's conviction?
Docket Entries
2019-03-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.
2019-02-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-11-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 15, 2019)
Attorneys
Trevor Little
Trevor Little — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent