WHETHER INOIGENT ANO/OR PRO SE DEFENDANTS IN CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS
HAVE OR ARE ENTITLED TO CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION FROM THE PRESENCE OP
SOCIOLECONOMIC DISCRIMINATION AS A PREJUOICIAL OR DETERMINATIVE MOTIVE
IN THEIR ARREST, PROSECUTIONI CONVICTION SENTENCING AND APPEAL DEMIALS-

(2) WHETHER SOCIDECONOMIC DISCRIMINATION IS SUCH A PREVASIVE AND DETRIMENTAL
OBSTACLE BETWEEN INDIGENT ANO/OR PRD SE DEFENOANTS AND THEIR ACCESS TO OUE PAOCESS
OF LAW AND EQVALPROTECTION OF THE LAW, IN JAILS AND PRISONS ACROSS THG UNITED.
STATES DF AMERICA, AS TO WARAANT THE INTERVENTION OF THE U.S- SUPREME COURT TO
ESTABLISH PRECEDENT CRITERIA TO IDENTIPY ANALYZE CHALLENGE AND ELIMINATE SUCH
DISCRIMINATION AS A PRETUDICIAL OR DETERMINATINE FACTOR IN CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS.

3) WHETHER, SPECIFICALLY IN BABB'S CASE SOCIDECONOMIC DISCRIMINATION WAS A
DETERMINATIVE FACTOR IN HIS DRIGINAL FALSE ARREST AND MONTAS OF FALSE IMPRISONMENT
ON CHARGES HE WAS NEVER TRIED OR CONVICTED OF.
PROSE CUTORS MALICIOUSLY PROSECUTING BABB ON KNOWN VERIFIABLE FALSE CHARQES TO
NEGATE THE STATE DF FLORIDAS LIABILITY OF HIS ORIGINAL FALSE ARREST AND IMPRISONMANT

(5) WHETHER IN PETITIONER HUBERT BABB'S CASE, THE ORVIOUS, PEASISTENT OISREGARDOE DIRECTLY RECORD VERIPIABLE AND FEDERAL COURT CONFIAMED FELONY CRIMES OF
PERJURY, COMMITED SPECIFICALLY FOR THE PURPOSE OF UNLAWFULLY DEPRIVINE BABB OF A
NEW TRIAL BY A FAIR AND IMPARTIAL, BUT DISREGARDED, EXCUSED AND FALSALY JUSTIFIED
CONTRARY TO THE LAW, THE RECORD THE EVIDENCE AND A WRITTEN FEDERAL REPORT, BY
COURTS OF EVERY LEVEL BELOW THE U.S- SUPREME COURT, STATE AND FEDERAL, IMPLITHE LAST.23 YEARS.

Whether indigent and/or pro se defendants in criminal prosecutions have constitutional protection from the presence of socioeconomic discrimination as a prejudicial or determinative motive in their arrest, prosecution, conviction, sentencing and appeal denials