(1) Whether the District Court's failure to conduct the analysis required by the Supreme Court in Johnson v. U.S., 135 S.Ct. 2551 (2015) before determining that Mr. Thomas was a career offender violated due process and was not a harmless error, as the Court of Appeals found.

(2) Whether the District Court's reliance upon an out-of-context jailhouse call at sentencing to rebut expert reports submitted by Mr. Thomas was improper and violated Mr. Thomas's due process rights.

Whether the District Court's failure to conduct the analysis required by the Supreme Court in Johnson v. U.S. violated due process