Can a prison sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release ever be substantively reasonable when: 1) it was authorized by virtue of the fact that the defendant was originally sentenced under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), 2) it exceeds the maximum revocation sentence for a defendant who did not qualify for the ACCA enhancement, 3) the defendant no longer qualifies as an armed career criminal in the wake of Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015), and 4) the defendant has already served more time in prison than the non-ACCA aggregate maximum for his original offense and any revocation?

Can a prison sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release ever be substantively reasonable when certain conditions are met?