No. 18-7904
Spassky Alcequiecz v. Kelly A. Ryan, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process fair-trial fourteenth-amendment ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel manslaughter manslaughter-instruction sixth-amendment
Latest Conference:
2019-03-22
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER THE PETITIONER WAS DENIED HIS CONSTITUTIONAL
RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL, DUE TO INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE
COUNSEL'S ABANDONEMENT ON A MANSLAUGHTER
OF COUNSEL, AS
INSTRUCTION ON
PROVOCATION, ON
A BELIEF., WHICH COUNSEL.
NOW ADMITS WAS
WRONG, DEPRIVED
THE PETITIONER OF DUE
PROCESS OF LAW UNDER THE SIXTH
AND
FOURTEENTH
AMENDMENT
TO THE
UNITED STATE CONSTITUTION.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the petitioner was denied his constitutional right to a fair trial, due to ineffective assistance of counsel
Docket Entries
2019-03-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.
2019-02-26
Waiver of right of respondent Ryan, Warden to respond filed.
2018-07-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 14, 2019)
Attorneys
Ryan, Warden
Susanne G. Reardon — Massachusetts Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Spassky Alcequiecz
Spassky Alcequiecz — Petitioner