Jerry Anderson, II v. Michigan
DueProcess CriminalProcedure
WAS DEFENDANT DENIED HIS STATE AND FEDERAL CONSOITUTIONAL RFGHTS TO EFRECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL WHEN HIS ATTORIVEY PAILED TO PREPARED FOR TRIAL AND COERCED HIM TO PLEAD GUILTY WHEN HE WANTED TO GO TO TREAL?
WAS DVE PROCESS VIOLATED WHERE THE DEFENDAIMT WAS HELD TO ANSWER FOR A CAPETAL OR OTHERWISE INFAMOUS CRIME WITHOUT BEING PRESEWTED OR INDICTED BY A GRAND JURY?
DID GOVERNMENTAL MISCONDUCT DEPRIVE T DEFENDANT OF HIS DUE PROCESS RIGHT'S OF THE U.S COWSTITUTION AMENDS V aNd XIV?
DID DERENDANT MAKE A KNOWING VOLUNTARY IWTELLIGENT PLEA BEFORE THE DISTRICT COURT & WAS DVE PROCESS VEOLATED AS A RESULT?
WAS DVE PROCESS VIOLATED WHERE DEFEMDANT DED NOT ENJER A KNOWENG, VOLUNOARY INTELLFGENT PLEA OF SECOND DEGREE MURDER IN CIREUFT COURT?
WAS DEFENDANT DENIED EFFECTIVE ASSIST AINCE OF APPELLATE COMNSEL WHERE SHE FAILED TO RHISE SUBSTANTIAL CLAIMS AND SHE DENFED THE DEFENDIANTS RIGHTS TO RAISE OHE CLAIMS HIMSELFR,
Was the defendant denied his state and federal constitutional rights to effective assistance of counsel when his attorney failed to prepare for trial and coerced him to plead guilty when he wanted to go to trial?