Is it appropriate to request "Superintendent Control" from the higher courts (in accordance to Article 3, section 2 of the Constitution) when the lower courts - - commit acts of "Fraud" and "Judicial Activism" with the intent to violate the - - 7th and 141h Amendment to Constitution (Equal protection, right to trial by jury and violation of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness, respectively)?"

Do "fraud" change the outcome of a case (either state of federal)?

Is Fraud the exception to the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine?

Do every subsequent act of "Fraud" toll the "Statute of Limitation for Fraud?"

Is it appropriate to request 'Superintendent Control' from the higher courts (in accordance to Article 3, section 2 of the Constitution) when the lower courts commit acts of 'Fraud' and 'Judicial Activism' with the intent to violate the 7th and 14th Amendment to Constitution (Equal protection, right to trial by jury and violation of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness, respectively)?