Christopher VanGuilder v. Daniel Martuscello, Superintendent, Coxsackie Correctional Facility
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy
QUESTION (1)
Whether United States District Second Circuit Court Of Appeals
and or said Lower Court's Erred in Failing to grant Petitioner's
Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel Claim/Argument regrddlliig
defense Conflict Of
Interest"and or Safeguard Petitioner's Sixth Amendment Right to
A Lawyer UnEncumbered by an Actual Conflict or Serious Potential
for Conflict Of Interest?
QUESTION (2)
Whether United States District Second Circuit Court Of Appeals
and or said Lower Court's Erred/Acted Contrary to established
Sixth Amendment Guarantees Of The United States and State Of New
York Constitutions and or Federal Standards due petitioner
regarding trial court's Conflict Of Interest Inquiry Colloquy
Claim/Argument?
QUESTION (3)
Whether United States District Second Circuit Court Of Appeals
and or said Lower Court's Acted Contrary to U.S.C.A.Const.Amend.
5,6,by Failing to grant Petitioner's Claim/Argument regarding
defense counsel(Stanclift)Failure to raise petitioner's :
"ENTRAPMENT Defense"?
QUESTION (4)
Whether United States District Second Circuit Court Of Appeals
and or said Lower Court's Erred in Allowing Prejudicial testimony/
evidence to be considered by the Grand Jury?
QUESTION (5)
Whether United States District Second Circuit Court Of Appeals
and or said Lower Court's Erred/Acted Contrary to established
Federal Case Law in failing to grant Petitioner's Claim/Argument
regarding trial court's failure to provide meaningful Supplemental
/Charge Instructions to the Grand Jury?
Whether United States District Second Circuit Court Of Appeals and or said Lower Court's Erred in Failing to grant Petitioner's Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel Claim/Argument reganding= defense counsel(Stanclift)UnLawful/UnConsentable Conflict Of Interestand or Safeguard Petitioner's Sixth Amendment Right to A Lawyer UnEncumbered by an Actual Conflict or Serious Potential for Conflict Of Interest?"