No. 18-7877
Lester Roger Decker v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: attorney-performance constitutional-law constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fair-trial ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel legal-representation right-to-counsel sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-03-22
Question Presented (from Petition)
Was defendant's attorney's role to fulfill his advisory position to his client ineffective, thus violating client's right to Due Process?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was defendant's attorney's role to fulfill his advisory position to his client ineffective, thus violating client's right to Due Process?
Docket Entries
2019-03-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.
2019-02-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-07-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 13, 2019)
Attorneys
Lester Roger Decker
Lester Roger Decker — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent