No. 18-7847
Ronell Howlett v. Reed Richardson, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process federal-court-review federal-review habeas-corpus habeas-corpus-28-usc-2254 procedural-bar rape-shield-law right-to-present-defense state-court state-court-review
Latest Conference:
2019-03-22
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is a federal court permitted/required to review a state court's reliance on a procedural bar, when a petitioner claims the application of the facts do not support the procedural bar?
Docket Entries
2019-03-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.
2019-02-12
Waiver of right of respondent Reed Richardson to respond filed.
2018-08-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 11, 2019)
Attorneys
Reed Richardson
Sara L. Shaeffer — Wisconsin Department of Justice, Respondent
Ronell Howlett
Ronell Howlett — Petitioner