No. 18-7829

Joe Homer Mark v. Amy Rabeau

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-02-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal appellate-review civil-procedure counsel-performance custodial-interrogation district-court fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel legal-error miranda-warning procedural-default self-incrimination standing
Latest Conference: 2019-03-22
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether Petitioner Joe Mark's Fifth Amendment Rights were violated when Mr. Mark was subject to custodial interrogation without Miranda warning having been given. Mark was denied his right against self-incrimination as guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution through the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution when the trial court erred by failing to suppress the statements made in Mark's first police station interview during an in-custody interrogation with no Miranda warning. Whether Petitioner was provided with inadequate assistance of counsel where a counsel failed to timely file an appeal, and ineffective assistance of counsel claim was not addressed by the district court.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Petitioner Joe Mark's Fifth Amendment Rights were violated

Docket Entries

2019-03-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.
2019-02-28
Waiver of right of respondent Amy Rabeau to respond filed.
2018-12-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 11, 2019)

Attorneys

Amy Rabeau
Ann Babette BlackState of Alaska, Office of Criminal Appeals, Respondent
Joe Mark
Joe Homer Mark — Petitioner