No. 18-7828

Robert Largo v. New York

Lower Court: New York
Docketed: 2019-02-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-law-section-440.10 due-process ineffective-assistance-of-counsel penal-law-section-70.02 persistent-violent-felony sentencing void-for-vagueness
Latest Conference: 2019-04-12
Question Presented (from Petition)

Did the New York State Supreme Court err in holding that as-applied, the part of Penal Law Section 70.02, subdivision one (2), challenged as being void for vagueness is not unconstitutional?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the New York State Supreme Court err in holding that, as-applied, the part of Penal Law Section 70.02, Subdivision one (c) challenged as void-for-vagueness is not unconstitutional?

Docket Entries

2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-01-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 11, 2019)

Attorneys

Robert Largo
Robert Largo — Petitioner