I. (i) WHETHER COUNSEL. RENDERED INEFFECTIVENESS FOR FAILING TO OBJECT
TO THE DRUG QUANTITY CALCULATION IN THE PSR, USED THREATS TO CORCE
PETITIONER TO PIFAD GUILTY; (ii) WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT DECISION
CONFLICT WITH THE DECISION OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT IN
STRICKLAND V. WASHINGTON, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, &0 L.Ed.2d
674 (1984); AND THE PENAL DECISION DIRECTLY CONFLICT WITH THE DECISION
IN MILLER-EL V. COCKREIL, 537 U.S.
322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 1.54
L.Ed.2d 931 (2003), WHEN THF EIGHIH CIRCUIT FAILED T0 ISSUE A
CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY WHERE THE RECORDS AND FILES SUPPORT IT?

Whether the lower court erred in dismissing petitioner's claims for lack of standing and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted