Did trial counsel perform ineffectively at Petitioner's second trial, when Petitioner's first trial, in which there was no mention of cell phone testimony, ended in a hung jury, by failing to object on Fourth Amendment grounds when the prosecution in the second trial made cell-site location information the literal bookends of its case?

2. Is the Stored Communications Act, 18 USC §§ 2701-2712 Unconstitutional because it allows cell site location information to be divulged to law enforcement without a warrant?

3. Was trial counsel ineffective for failing to examine the Detroit Police Department's request for the §2703(d) Order to determine whether or not it complied with the mandatory language of the SCA and subsequently to examine the magistrate's granting of the request?

4. Was trial counsel ineffective for failing to object to the cellular telephone evidence on Fourth Amendment grounds and to request a pretrial suppression hearing regarding the same.

5. Was appellate counsel ineffective for failing to raise ineffective assistance of trial counsel?

6. Was the Detroit Police Department's acquisition of Petitioner's cell-site records a search under the Fourth Amendment?

Did trial counsel perform ineffectively at Petitioner's second trial