No. 18-7808
Michael Duane Wilson v. Robert LeGrand, Warden, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review claim-splitting due-process exhaustion-of-remedies federal-courts federal-habeas habeas-corpus judicial-review legal-standard ninth-circuit post-conviction state-courts sufficiency-of-evidence
Latest Conference:
2019-03-22
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Erred in Sanctioning the Ability of Courts to Refashion a Habeas Claims into Various Subparts and then Find that the Newly Constituted Habeas Claims are Unexhausted?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Erred in Sanctioning the Ability of Courts to Refashion a Habeas Claims into Various Subparts and then Find that the Newly Constituted Habeas Claims are Unexhausted?
Docket Entries
2019-03-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.
2019-03-04
Waiver of right of respondents Robert LeGrand, et al. to respond filed.
2019-02-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 11, 2019)
Attorneys
Michael Wilson
Jason F Carr — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Robert LeGrand, et al.
Heather Diane Procter — Respondent