Legally or procedurally, can a warrant withstand the scrutiny of at least 30 N.C.I.C., and F.C.I.C. warrant searches, or of the defendant being in the custody of the same officials alleged to have possession of an "active" warrant, for about 81% of the time while the alleged warrant allegedly remained active?

Did the respective court's violate Krott's substantive due process rights by dismissing Krott's petition for lack of jurisdiction, with over 100 proceedings having been filed maintaining an "open controversy" status with this case?

How can jurisdiction be lacking, over the conviction and sentence being challenged, if the warrant over the conviction and sentence being challenged, is currently "active" under case No. 97024022TC10A, the fabricated warrant case number arrested over, and being challenged in the §2254 petition?

Whether the petitioner's substantive due process rights were violated when the courts dismissed his habeas petition despite the existence of an active warrant related to the challenged conviction and sentence