No. 18-7777
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeals civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process federal-courts federal-jurisdiction habeas-corpus standing
Latest Conference:
2019-03-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
Will the writ of mandamus to be issued to Justice for the Fourth Circuit define the U.S. Court of Appeals the Fourth Circuit in the case entitled Sanow Brice to summarily hear And rmond Appeal No. 18-7485, And dispose of thematter as law the tacts justice requine.
Will the wow-action that is being tokew on this seview result iNe ms irreparmble the nejury that is beineg/ totew ow this seview 4 due process riolt undert f.fth amendmennt of the U.s.Coustit
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit erred in denying habeas corpus relief to the petitioner
Docket Entries
2019-03-18
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of mandamus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2019-02-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2019-02-14
Waiver of right of respondent UNITED STATES to respond filed.
2019-01-29
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 7, 2019)
Attorneys
Jaron Brice
Jaron R. Brice — Petitioner
UNITED STATES
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent