DID THE ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT ABUSE ITS DISCRETION WHERE THE COURT AFFIRMED THE APPELLATE COURT'S RULING THAT THE USAGE OF HEARSAY WITHIN THE PETITIONER'S CASE WAS ADMISSIBLE AND JUSTIFIED ACCORDING TO RULES 10-15.1, WHEN CLEARLY THE EVIDENCE MISCONSTRUED AND MISAPPLIED THE LAW.

DID THE ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT ERROR WHEN IT DENIED RELIEF ON PETITIONER'S PETITION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL CONSIDERING THE CLOSE AND BALANCED EVIDENCE WITHIN THE PETITIONER'S CASE.

DID THE ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT ABUSE ITS DISCRETION OR ERROR BY AFFIRMING THE APPELLATE COURT'S RULING THAT THE MANNER IN WHICH THE TRIAL COURT APPLIED PETITIONER'S POST-TRIAL HEARING AND ITS PROCEDURE DID NOT DENY DEFENDANT DUE PROCESS OF LAW.

DID THE ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT ERROR WHEN IT DENIED RELIEF ON PETITIONER'S PETITION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL CONSIDERING PETITIONER'S TRIAL COUNSEL'S FAILURE AND INEFFECTIVENESS CONCERNING COUNSEL'S FAILURE TO OBJECT TO ADMISSION OF HEARSAY EVIDENCE.

Did the appellate court abuse its discretion in finding that the evidence of prior acts was admissible and justified according to FRE 404(b), when the appellate court disregarded and disagreed with the district court's evidentiary ruling?