Did the Court of Appeals err in denying a certificate of appeal-
ability and in evaluating petitioner's claims: 1) that his rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) were violated when police failed to inform petitioner that he had a right to have counsel appointed if he could not afford counsel; and 2) that petitioner was denied his right to the effective assistance of counsel when his trial attorney failed to assert that police failed to give a full and complete Miranda admonition?

Did the Court of Appeals err in denying a certificate of appealability and in evaluating petitioner's claims