No. 18-7668

Patricio Paladin v. United States

Lower Court: First Circuit
Docketed: 2019-01-30
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: almendarez-torres-v-united-states apprendi-doctrine apprendi-v-new-jersey constitutional-element criminal-procedure due-process jury-trial jury-trial-guarantee prior-conviction sentencing sentencing-enhancement sentencing-enhancements
Latest Conference: 2019-03-01
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether the contested fact of prior conviction entering into the sentence to increase a defendant's penalty for the instant offense, must be treated as a constitutional "element" of the crime within the meaning of this Court's holding in Apprendi V. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), warranting reconsideration of Almendarez-Torres V. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), statutory limitation on the type of facts subject to the jury trial guarantee?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the contested fact of prior conviction entering into the sentence to increase a defendant's penalty for the instant offense, must be treated as a constitutional 'element' of the crime within the meaning of this Court's holding in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), warranting reconsideration of Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), statutory limitation on the type of facts subject to the jury trial guarantee?

Docket Entries

2019-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2019.
2019-02-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-11-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 1, 2019)

Attorneys

Patricio Paladin
Patricio Paladin — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent