Whether the U.S. 5' Or. Court of Appeals has so far departure from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceeding in light of; 14Jllams v. Taylor, 120 S.Ct. 1495, 529 U.S. 362 (2000) (citing Marbury v. MadLcon, I Cranch 137,177 (1803); Tegue v. an 489 U.S. 288, 109 S.Ct. 1060 (1989)), and sanction such an departure by the U.S. District Court. (E.D.(La)), as to call for an exercise of this Court's saipervisory power, which the judicial power under section 2 of article 3 of the Constitution shall extend to a case in law and equity, arising under the Constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made, or which shalt be made, under their authority; to controversies which the United States shall be a party. Muskrat v. US., 31 SCt. 250, 219 U.S. 346 (1911)(citing Harbur&s Case, 2 DaIL 409 (1792); US. v. F erreira 13 How 40 (1251); QudiiL tcLStutig 117 13.5. 694 (1264); &iltimarg & O.R.Ca. v. Jnttate Commerce Commission, 215 U.S. 216, 80 S.Ct. Rep 86 (1909); Chish olm v. Georgia, 2 Dali 432 (1793); Osborn v. Bank of United States, 9 Wheat. 819 (1824); Coh ens v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 6 Wheat. 264, 387, 5 L.Ed. 257 (1821); C1ücagp& G.TR. Co., v. Welbnan, 143 U.S. 339, 12 S.Ct. Rep. 400 (1982).

Whether the U.S. 5th Cir. Court of Appeals has so far departure from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceeding