(1.) Whether notwithstanding the substance or character of the motion to recall the mandate the tnited
tion without first deter
-mininq whether a case-ormeaninq of Constitution existcontroversy within the
through all stages of
to appellate?

2.) whether
the question of the jurisdiction of the
.firstinstance on direct apCourt
Appeals in
peal, and subsequently
to reach the merits of the motion to recall the mar
date qoes to
o the question of
the jurisdiction of t
court on certiorari?
Supreme

(3.) whether the requirement
that the appellate court
satisfy itself of the jurisdiction of the lower court
view was sufficiently met in the case under review
fo recall the mandate?

Whether the appellate court abused its discretion in deciding the merits of a motion to recall the mandate without first determining jurisdiction