Julius Darius Jones v. Oklahoma
1. Whether newly-discovered evidence establishes that racial prejudice influenced the decision of at least one juror to convict Mr. Jones and sentence him to death in violation of his rights under the Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution?
2. Whether Oklahoma's capital post-conviction statute, specifically Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 22, § 1089(D)(8)(b), and the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals' application of the statute in Mr. Jones' case, denies Mr. Jones an adequate corrective process for the hearing and determination of his newly-available federal constitutional claim in violation of his rights under the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses?
Whether newly-discovered evidence establishes that racial prejudice influenced the decision of at least one juror to convict Mr. Jones and sentence him to death in violation of his rights under the Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution?