No. 18-7635
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: adversarial-process due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel fair-trial sentencing-enhancements sixth-amendment united-states-v-cronic
Latest Conference:
2019-05-30
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1) Whether Mr. Hall was denied effective assistance of counsel required by the federal constitution' sixth Amendment when his trialcounsel refused o prticipatntheral prcedin therylowing complete breadwnin theerral poces, and denying Miall a fairtrial?
2) We the Con h Supreme Courts holdings in United States vCronic?
3) whether the sentencing court ered when it departed fromthe enhancements Codifiedat 8 13A-12-250 and $1BA-12-270 as that no additional punisment pursuant to any sentenceenhane ment statutes shall apply.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Mr. Hol was denied effective assistance of counsel required by the Federal constitution's Sixth Amendment
Docket Entries
2019-06-03
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-05-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2019.
2019-04-10
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2019-02-21
Waiver of right of respondent Alabama to respond filed.
2018-09-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 28, 2019)
Attorneys
Alabama
Tracy Millar Daniel — Alabama Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Harold Hall
Harold Hall — Petitioner