No. 18-7634
Lincoln E. Fox v. Neil Turner, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review confrontation-clause criminal-procedure due-process evidence evidentiary-error fair-trial ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel victim-testimony witness-testimony
Latest Conference:
2019-03-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
I) Reasonable jurists could debate whether the trial court's admission of a videotaped statement of the victim in violation of Evid.R. 803(4) denied Appellant a fundamentally fair trial.
Jurists could debate whether Appellants convictions were not supported by sufficient evidence
Jurists could debate whether trial courts admission of testimony by Nurse Exner about the veracity of the child witness denied Appellant a fundamentally fair trial.
Appellant was denied effective assistance of trial & appellate counsel.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the trial court's admission of a videotaped statement of the victim violated the defendant's right to a fair trial
Docket Entries
2019-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2019-02-20
Waiver of right of respondent Neil Turner, Warden to respond filed.
2018-03-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 28, 2019)
Attorneys
Lincoln Fox
Lincoln E. Fox — Petitioner
Neil Turner, Warden
Benjamin Michael Flowers — Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, Respondent