No. 18-7634

Lincoln E. Fox v. Neil Turner, Warden

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-01-29
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review confrontation-clause criminal-procedure due-process evidence evidentiary-error fair-trial ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel victim-testimony witness-testimony
Latest Conference: 2019-03-15
Question Presented (from Petition)

I) Reasonable jurists could debate whether the trial court's admission of a videotaped statement of the victim in violation of Evid.R. 803(4) denied Appellant a fundamentally fair trial.

Jurists could debate whether Appellants convictions were not supported by sufficient evidence

Jurists could debate whether trial courts admission of testimony by Nurse Exner about the veracity of the child witness denied Appellant a fundamentally fair trial.

Appellant was denied effective assistance of trial & appellate counsel.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the trial court's admission of a videotaped statement of the victim violated the defendant's right to a fair trial

Docket Entries

2019-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2019-02-20
Waiver of right of respondent Neil Turner, Warden to respond filed.
2018-03-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 28, 2019)

Attorneys

Lincoln Fox
Lincoln E. Fox — Petitioner
Neil Turner, Warden
Benjamin Michael FlowersOhio Attorney General Dave Yost, Respondent